esjlEurasian Scientific Journal of LawEurasian Scientific Journal of Law2959-41972959-4200Университет «Туран»10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-3-58-67esjl-231Research ArticleМЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ И СРАВНИТЕЛЬНОЕ ПРАВОINTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAWПрирода, содержание и применение «публичного порядка» в международном частном правеThe nature, content and application of “public order” in private international lawhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-027XСаринаС. А.SarinaS. A.

к.ю.н., арбитр.

г. Алматы

c.l.s., arbitrator

Almaty

s.sarina@turan-edu.kzМеждународный арбитраж IUSКазахстанInternational Arbitration Court IUSKazakhstan20240503202503 (8)5867Copyright © Сарина С.А., 20242024Сарина С.А.Sarina S.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esjl.turan-edu.kz/jour/article/view/231

В данной статье хотелось бы остановиться на изучении таких аспектов этой проблемы, как природа, содержание и применение «публичного порядка» в международном частном праве. По ситуации, которая сложилась сегодня в казахстанской практике, очевидно, что поставленные нами вопросы, в особенности вопрос о противоречии публичному порядку, имеют больше теоретический характер и практический характер для международного частного права. Однако такое основание, как противоречие публичному порядку, вопрос о публичном порядке, возникает при применении норм иностранного права, при исполнении иностранных арбитражных и судебных решений, а также при оказании правовой помощи (например, выполнение поручения, осуществление процессуальных действий) иностранному государству. Несмотря на это, сочетание слов «публичный порядок» все еще не нашло единого точного, конкретного, наиболее верного определения, отражающего его смысл.

In this article I would like to focus on the study of such aspects of this problem as:nature, content and application of “public policy” in private international law. Given the current situation in Kazakhstani practice, it is obvious that the questions we have raised, especially the question of contradiction to public order, are more theoretical in nature and practical in nature for international private law. However, such a basis as contradiction to public order, in the question of public order arises when applying the norms of foreign law, when executing foreign arbitration and judicial decisions, and when providing legal assistance (for example, executing an assignment, carrying out procedural actions) to a foreign state. Despite this, the combination of words “public order” has not yet found a single precise, specific, most accurate definition reflecting its meaning.

международное частное правовзаимностьпубличный порядокарбитражное решениепризнаниеисполнениеарбитражное соглашениеinternational private lawreciprocitypublic policyarbitration awardrecognitionenforcementarbitration agreementReferencesMorozova Ju.G. Agreement on public order: reasons for its emergence // Legislation. 2000. No. 6. P. 8–16.Morozova Ju.G. (2000) Agreement on public order: reasons for its emergence // Legislation. No. 6. P. 8–16. (In English).Hasjanov R.Sh. European public order, European legal transit and European convention on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms: their relationships and interactions. St. Petersburg, 2005. – 24 p.Hasjanov R.Sh. (2005) European public order, European legal transit and European convention on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms: their relationships and interactions. St. Petersburg, 24 p. (In English).Kazachenok S.Ju. Contradictory public order as a special category of grounds for state interference in international commercial arbitration // Vestnik of Volgograd State University. Series 5: Jurisprudence. 2014. No. 2(23). P. 98–111.Kazachenok S.Ju. (2014) Contradictory public order as a special category of grounds for state interference in international commercial arbitration // Vestnik of Volgograd State University. Series 5: Jurisprudence. No. 2(23). P. 98–111. (In English).Monastyrskij Ju. Je. State doctrines of collective law in the USA / diss. ... cand. jurid. science. M.: Institute of state and law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1999. 136 p.Monastyrskij Ju. Je. (1999) State doctrines of collective law in the USA / diss. ... cand. jurid. science. M.: Institute of state and law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 136 p. (In English).Merezhko A.A. Science of international private law: history and modernity. Kiev: Takson, 2006. – 356 p.Merezhko A.A. (2006) Science of international private law: history and modernity. Kiev: Takson, 356 p. (In English).Makarov A.N. Fundamentals of international private law. M.: Jur. izdat. Narkomjusta RSFSR, 1924. 151 p.Makarov A.N. (1924) Fundamentals of international private law. M.: Jur. izdat. Narkomjusta RSFSR, 151 p. (In English).Lunc L.A. Course in international private law: in 3 volumes. M.: Spark, 2002. Vol. 1. 384 p.Lunc L.A. (2002) Course in international private law: in 3 volumes. M.: Spark. Vol. 1. 384 p. (In English).International private law: foreign legislation / Preface by A.L. Makovsky. M.: Statut, 2000. 892 p.International private law: foreign legislation / Preface by A.L. Makovsky. M.: Statut, 2000. 892 p. (In English).Esimhanov E. Reciprocity and public order as key aspects of recognition and enforcement in the execution of foreign arbitration decisions // Jurist. 2006. No. 4. URL: www.online.zakon.kz (aссessed: 23.03.2018)Esimhanov E. (2006) Reciprocity and public order as key aspects of recognition and enforcement in the execution of foreign arbitration decisions // Jurist. No. 4. URL: www.online.zakon.kz (assessed: 23.03.2018). (In English).June-Jordan Convention of 10 June 1958 “On recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration decisions”. URL: www.uncitral.org.ru (aссessed: 23.03.2018)June-Jordan Convention of 10 June 1958 “On recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration decisions”. URL: www.uncitral.org.ru (assessed: 23.03.2018). (In English).Сулейменов М.К. Применение оговорки о публичном порядке в судебной практике. URL: www.online.zakon.kz (дата обращения: 23.03.2018)Sulejmenov M.K. Primenenie ogovorki o publichnom porjadke v sudebnoj praktike. URL: www.online.zakon.kz (data obrashhenija: 23.03.2018). (In Russian).Sulejmenov M.K. How the court interpreted the law according to its own amendment. URL: www.online.zakon.kz (aссessed: 23.03.2018)Sulejmenov M.K. How the court interpreted the law according to its own amendment. URL: www.online.zakon.kz (assessed: 23.03.2018). (In English).Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of April 8, 2016 No. 488-V “On arbitration”. URL: www.online.zakon.kz (aссessed: 23.03.2018)Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of April 8, 2016 No. 488-V “On arbitration”. URL: www.online.zakon.kz (assessed: 23.03.2018). (In English).Tolstyh V.L. Conflict regulation in international private law: problems of interpretation and implementation of Section VII of Part Three GK RF. – M.: Spark, 2002. – 244 p.Tolstyh V.L. (2002) Conflict regulation in international private law: problems of interpretation and implementation of Section VII of Part Three GK RF. M.: Spark, 244 p. (In English).Mengliev Sh.M. International private law. Dushanbe: Typography of Tajik National University, 2013. 736 p.Mengliev Sh.M. (2013) International private law. Dushanbe: Typography of Tajik National University, 736 p. (In English).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.