докторант
г. Алматы
doctoral student
Almaty
к.ю.н., профессор
г. Алматы
c.l.s., professor
Almaty
PhD, профессор
г. Гданьск
PhD, рrofessor
Gdansk
В статье рассматриваются распространенные правовые ошибки, допускаемые заказчиками в процессе осуществления государственных закупок, причины их возникновения, квалификационные требования к ответственным сотрудникам, классификация ошибок, а также аспекты применения мер государственного принуждения и их правовые последствия. Кроме того, анализируются недостатки закупочных процедур с целью разработки превентивных мер по их устранению. Цель исследования – выявить типичные ошибки, часто совершаемые заказчиками, проанализировать факторы их возникновения и предложить научно обоснованные рекомендации и профилактические меры, направленные на их снижение. Также в рамках исследования ставится задача определения механизмов, способствующих усилению ответственности заказчиков и повышению прозрачности государственных закупок. Научная значимость исследования определяется комплексным анализом, направленным на систематизацию ошибок заказчиков в системе государственных закупок и выявление их причин. Практическая значимость заключается в возможности применения результатов исследования для повышения правовой грамотности заказчиков, обеспечения соблюдения законодательства и оптимизации процедур закупок. В ходе исследования были использованы методы сравнительно-правового анализа, системный и структурный подходы, а также экспертный обзор нормативных правовых актов. Результаты исследования выявили типичные ошибки заказчиков и их негативное влияние на эффективность государственных закупок. В целях их предотвращения предлагается повысить правовую грамотность заказчиков, усилить эффективность организации закупочных процедур и усовершенствовать механизмы контроля. Кроме того, подчеркивается необходимость повышения профессиональной подготовки лиц, ответственных за государственные закупки, с целью снижения количества правонарушений.
The article examines common legal errors made by contracting authorities during the implementation of public procurement processes, the causes of these errors, the qualification requirements for responsible personnel, the classification of mistakes, as well as aspects of applying state enforcement measures and their legal consequences. In addition, the study analyzes shortcomings in procurement procedures with the aim of developing preventive measures for their elimination. The purpose of the study is to identify typical errors frequently committed by contracting authorities, analyze the factors contributing to their occurrence, and propose scientifically grounded recommendations and preventive measures aimed at reducing these errors. Furthermore, the research aims to identify mechanisms that promote greater accountability among contracting authorities and enhance transparency in public procurement. The scientific significance of the study lies in its comprehensive analysis aimed at systematizing the errors of contracting authorities within the public procurement system and identifying their root causes. The practical significance is defined by the possibility of applying the research findings to improve the legal literacy of contracting authorities, ensure compliance with legislation, and optimize procurement procedures. The study employs methods of comparative legal analysis, systemic and structural approaches, as well as expert review of normative legal acts. The research results reveal typical errors made by contracting authorities and their negative impact on the efficiency of public procurement. To prevent these issues, it is proposed to increase the legal literacy of contracting authorities, enhance the effectiveness of procurement organization, and improve control mechanisms. In addition, the necessity of improving the professional training of officials responsible for public procurement is emphasized in order to reduce the number of legal violations. The article examines common legal errors made by contracting authorities during the implementation of public procurement processes, the causes of these errors, the qualification requirements for responsible personnel, the classification of mistakes, as well as aspects of applying state enforcement measures and their legal consequences. In addition, the study analyzes shortcomings in procurement procedures with the aim of developing preventive measures for their elimination. The purpose of the study is to identify typical errors frequently committed by contracting authorities, analyze the factors contributing to their occurrence, and propose scientifically grounded recommendations and preventive measures aimed at reducing these errors. Furthermore, the research aims to identify mechanisms that promote greater accountability among contracting authorities and enhance transparency in public procurement. The scientific significance of the study lies in its comprehensive analysis aimed at systematizing the errors of contracting authorities within the public procurement system and identifying their root causes. The practical significance is defined by the possibility of applying the research findings to improve the legal literacy of contracting authorities, ensure compliance with legislation, and optimize procurement procedures. The study employs methods of comparative legal analysis, systemic and structural approaches, as well as expert review of normative legal acts. The research results reveal typical errors made by contracting authorities and their negative impact on the efficiency of public procurement. To prevent these issues, it is proposed to increase the legal literacy of contracting authorities, enhance the effectiveness of procurement organization, and improve control mechanisms. In addition, the necessity of improving the professional training of officials responsible for public procurement is emphasized in order to reduce the number of legal violations.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.