esjlEurasian Scientific Journal of LawEurasian Scientific Journal of Law2959-41972959-4200Университет «Туран»10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-3-198-210esjl-894Research ArticleУГОЛОВНОЕ ПРАВО, УГОЛОВНЫЙ ПРОЦЕССCRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINAL PROCESSОбщая амнистия в уголовном судопроизводстве Казахстана и Турции: особенности применения к незавершенным уголовным деламGeneral amnesty in criminal proceedings in Kazakhstan and Turkey: features of application to unfinished criminal caseshttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-1276-3021ИнанТ. К.İnanT. C.

PhD, ассоциированный профессор

Северная Македония

PhD, associate professor

North Macedonia

 

tevfikcan.inan@vizyon.edu.mkБугыбайД. Б.BugybayD. B.

к.ю.н., ассоциированный профессор

г. Актау

c.l.s, associate professor

Aktau

Bugybaydina@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6909-4509АдиловаК. А.AdilovaK. A.

к.ю.н., ассоциированный профессор

г. Жезказган

c.l.s, associate professor

Zhezkazgan

kultay.adil@gmail.comМеждународный университет VisionМакедонияInternational Vision UniversityMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofYessenov UniversityКазахстанYessenov UniversityKazakhstanНАО «Университет Улытау»КазахстанUlytau UniversityKazakhstan20261809202603(16)198210Copyright © Инан Т.К., Бугыбай Д.Б., Адилова К.А., 20262026Инан Т.К., Бугыбай Д.Б., Адилова К.А.İnan T.C., Bugybay D.B., Adilova K.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://esjl.turan-edu.kz/jour/article/view/894

Амнистия представляет собой правовой институт, выражающий полный либо частичный отказ государства от реализации своих полномочий по уголовному преследованию и наказанию за совершенные преступления. Она влечет существенные правовые последствия как в сфере уголовного права, так и в области уголовного судопроизводства. В настоящем исследовании рассматриваются понятие амнистии и ее виды, а также анализируются правовые последствия общей амнистии в контексте уголовного права и уголовного процесса. Проведен анализ законодательства Казахстана и Турции, особое внимание уделяется процессуальным последствиям применения общей амнистии к уголовным делам, находящимся на стадии расследования или судебного разбирательства. В этой связи исследуются вопросы вынесения решения об отказе в уголовном преследовании на стадии расследования, прекращения уголовного дела в суде, а также возможности немедленного оправдания в отдельных случаях. Представляется необходимым закрепить в уголовно-процессуальном законодательстве Казахстана и Турции обязательное выяснение позиции лица относительно применения амнистии на всех стадиях уголовного судопроизводства, поскольку прекращение уголовного преследования в связи с амнистией не должно автоматически лишать лицо возможности добиваться рассмотрения дела по существу и установления своей невиновности.

Amnesty is a legal institution that expresses the state’s complete or partial renunciation of its power to prosecute and punish crimes, producing significant consequences for both substantive criminal law and criminal procedure law. This study first examines the concept and types of amnesty, and subsequently analyzes the legal effects of general amnesty within the framework of criminal law and criminal procedure law. An analysis of the legislation of Kazakhstan and Turkey is conducted, рarticular emphasis is placed on the procedural implications of applying general amnesty to ongoing investigations and prosecutions. In this context, issues such as the decision of non-prosecution during the investigation phase, the dismissal of the case during the prosecution phase, and the possibility of immediate acquittal in certain circumstances are discussed. It is essential to establish in the criminal procedure legislation of Kazakhstan and Turkey a mandatory requirement to ascertain a person’s position regarding the application of amnesty at all stages of criminal proceedings, as the termination of criminal prosecution due to amnesty should not automatically deprive a person of the opportunity to seek a trial on the merits and establish their innocence.

общая амнистияуголовно-процессуальное правопрекращение уголовного преследованиярасследование и судебное разбирательствоуголовное правоуголовная политикагуманизмgeneral amnestycriminal procedure lawdismissal of public prosecutioninvestigation and prosecutioncriminal lawcriminal policyhumanismReferencesArslan U. Turkish Amnesty Law: Amnesty Laws to Date and Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding Amnesty // Yetkin Publications. 2022. No. 20. P. 119–131.Arslan U. Turkish Amnesty Law: Amnesty Laws to Date and Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding Amnesty // Yetkin Publications. 2022. No. 20. P. 119–131.Aydın D. Attempted Crime // Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Law. 2006. No. 1. P. 85–113.Aydın D. Attempted Crime // Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Law. 2006. No. 1. P. 85–113.Can S. The Institution of Amnesty in Turkish Law // Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Law. 2016. No. 4. P. 1291–1312.Can S. The Institution of Amnesty in Turkish Law // Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Law. 2016. No. 4. P. 1291–1312.Centel N., Zafer H., Çakmut Ö. Introduction to Turkish Criminal Law // Beta Publications. 2014. No. 2. P. 198–208.Centel N., Zafer H., Çakmut Ö. Introduction to Turkish Criminal Law // Beta Publications. 2014. No. 2. P. 198–208.Bouzat P. Amnistie // Répertoire de Droit Criminel et de Procédure Pénale. Vol. I. Paris: Dalloz. 1953. No. 6. P. 11–22.Bouzat P. Amnistie // Répertoire de Droit Criminel et de Procédure Pénale. Vol. I. Paris: Dalloz. 1953. No. 6. P. 11–22.Dönmezer E. Criminal Law: General Provisions // Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2015. No. 11. P. 349–356.Dönmezer E. Criminal Law: General Provisions // Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2015. No. 11. P. 349–356.Dursun H. An Overview of the Concept of Amnesty // Journal of the Union of Turkish Bar Associations. 2009. No. 856. P. 387–405.Dursun H. An Overview of the Concept of Amnesty // Journal of the Union of Turkish Bar Associations. 2009. No. 856. P. 387–405.Gözler K. The Power of Amnesty in Comparative Constitutional Law // Constitutional Adjudication. 2001. No. 18. P. 303–430.Gözler K. The Power of Amnesty in Comparative Constitutional Law // Constitutional Adjudication. 2001. No. 18. P. 303–430.Koca M. Characteristics of Regulations Regarding Special Amnesty and the Execution Regime // Constitutional Adjudication. 2021. No. 1. P. 1–36.Koca M. Characteristics of Regulations Regarding Special Amnesty and the Execution Regime // Constitutional Adjudication. 2021. No. 1. P. 1–36.Koca M., Üzülmez İ. Turkish Criminal Law: General Provisions // Seçkin Publishing. 2020. No. 8. P. 93–110.Koca M., Üzülmez İ. Turkish Criminal Law: General Provisions // Seçkin Publishing. 2020. No. 8. P. 93–110.Luggat Ottoman-Turkish Dictionary. URL: https://www.luggat.com (accessed: 19.02.2025)Luggat Ottoman-Turkish Dictionary. URL: https://www.luggat.com (accessed: 19.02.2025)Özbek V.Ö., Kanbur M.N., Doğan K., Bacaksız P., Tepe İ. Turkish Criminal Law: General Provisions // Seçkin Publishing. 2014. No. 5. P. 327–245.Özbek V.Ö., Kanbur M.N., Doğan K., Bacaksız P., Tepe İ. Turkish Criminal Law: General Provisions // Seçkin Publishing. 2014. No. 5. P. 327–245.Özgenç İ. Turkish Criminal Law: General Provisions // Seçkin Publishing. 2020. No. 2. P. 58–71.Özgenç İ. Turkish Criminal Law: General Provisions // Seçkin Publishing. 2020. No. 2. P. 58–71.Soyaslan D. Criminal Law: General Provisions // Yetkin Publications. 2020. No. 10. P. 666–675.Soyaslan D. Criminal Law: General Provisions // Yetkin Publications. 2020. No. 10. P. 666–675.Sözüer A. Amnesty in Turkish Law; The Legal Nature of Provisions Regarding Conditional Release and Suspension of Sentences Envisaged in Laws No. 4454 and 4616, and the Issue of the Constitutionality of These Provisions // Constitutional Adjudication (Anayasa Yargısı). 2001. No. 18. P. 118–120.Sözüer A. Amnesty in Turkish Law; The Legal Nature of Provisions Regarding Conditional Release and Suspension of Sentences Envisaged in Laws No. 4454 and 4616, and the Issue of the Constitutionality of These Provisions // Constitutional Adjudication (Anayasa Yargısı). 2001. No. 18. P. 118–120.H. Mustafa Hussein. General Amnesty and its impact on criminal and disciplinary [matters] // Qalaai Zanist Scientific Journal. 2018. No. 3(2). P. 94–119.H. Mustafa Hussein. General Amnesty and its impact on criminal and disciplinary [matters] // Qalaai Zanist Scientific Journal. 2018. No. 3(2). P. 94–119.M. Shafiq Mandozai, A. Zadran. Characteristics and Effects of Amnesty and Pardon // Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities. 2023. No. 3(3). P. 89–94.M. Shafiq Mandozai, A. Zadran. Characteristics and Effects of Amnesty and Pardon // Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities. 2023. No. 3(3). P. 89–94.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.