Experience of probation in far and near abroad countries
https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-2-63-72
Abstract
Probation is an alternative solution to punishment and is still being improved, it allows society to prevent relatively less serious crimes with minimal losses. Kazakhstan is also on the lookout, and experience in implementing probation in foreign countries should be in demand in Kazakhstan and other post-Soviet states. Using the experience of far and near abroad countries, the possibilities of forming a domestic probation service are revealed, and this contributes to improving the efficiency of the country’s penal correction system.
Keywords
About the Author
B. K. ShnarbayevKazakhstan
d.l.s., associate professor
Kostanay
References
1. Abaturov A.I. Retrospective analysis of post-penitentiary support in Europe. Astana, 2016.
2. Accurev A.S. Some issues of improving the activities of the Committee of criminal – Executive system of the Ministry of justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan // Young scientist. 2011, no. 3, vol. 2, pp. 46–49.
3. Support for judicial and legal reform in the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2017. URL: http://pandia.org/text/78/045/25561-28.php
4. The probation system in the Czech Republic // Juvenal justice issues. 2009. No. 2. Р. 27–31.
5. Zubarev S.I. Organization of execution of criminal punishments without isolation of the convicted person from society in foreign countries // Bulletin of the Institute: crime, punishment, correction. 2011, no. 18, p. 66.
6. Grosup O. Conditional watch. 2012. URL: http://www.kommersant.md/node/10488
7. Law of the Republic of Moldova // Monitorul Oficial. 2008. February 20.
8. Review of the legislation of the Scandinavian and Baltic countries on the probation service (criminal supervision). Series “Human Rights”. St. Petersburg, 2005.
9. Federal Probation and Pretrial Officers Association. 2014. URL: http://www.fppoa.org://www.fppoa.org/ (accessed: 12.02.2014)
10. Probation in the United States. J. Petersila. 1998. P. 32.
11. Kalugina M.A. Рeculiarities of functioning of the probation service in the United States. 2014.
12. Nagorny R.V. Legal and organizational bases of personnel support for the activities of the penitentiary system of the Ministryof Justice of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2003, p. 25.
13. Timashev N.S. Conditional conviction. M., I914. URL: http://modernlib.ru/books/ns_timashev/uslovnoe_osuzhdenie/
14. Struchkov N.A. Legislation on the execution of criminal punishment in foreign socialist countries. M.: Academy of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1978, p. 86.
15. Uzda K. Criminality and criminology in modern Japan. Moscow: Progress, 1989. 256 р. URL: http://www.juristlib.ru/book_6344.html
16. Geta M.R. Probation in the criminal law of foreign countries. Ust-Kamenogorsk, 2004, p. 51.
17. Khutorsky N.B. Organization and activity of the probation service abroad // Analytical review. Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Moscow. 2015.
Review
For citations:
Shnarbayev B.K. Experience of probation in far and near abroad countries. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2024;(2 (7)):63-72. https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-2-63-72