Procedural balance in criminal proceedings: rights of the victim and the suspect

This article addresses the issue of ensuring proportional protection of the rights of victims and suspects (accused persons) within the framework of criminal proceedings. The author emphasizes the importance of recognizing and enforcing the procedural rights of the victim at the stage of preliminary investigation on an equal footing with other participants in the criminal process. The absence of an effective mechanism and clear legal regulation for the provision of state legal assistance to victims creates an imbalance between the parties and undermines the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution. According to the author, eliminating this imbalance requires granting victims an expanded scope of rights comparable to those of suspects and accused persons in order to restore the principles of justice and legality. The article presents a comparative legal analysis of the criminal procedure legislation of Russia and the Republic of Kazakhstan, highlighting positive aspects of the Kazakhstani model recommended for adoption in the legal system of the Russian Federation. The relevance of establishing a Victims’ Compensation Fund in Russia, based on the example of Kazakhstan’s experience, is also substantiated.

1. Abdulvaliev A.F. (2024) Voprosy realizacii gosudarstvennoj zashhity prav poterpevshih v ramkah ugolovnogo processa // Zhurnal «Viktimologija». V. 11. No. 1. P. 78–91. (In Russian).

2. Smahtin E.V., Smirnova I.G. (2015) Ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie instrumenty obespechenija prav poterpevshih pri osushhestvlenii zadach ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Kriminologicheskij vestnik Bajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta jekonomiki i prava. V. 9. No. 2. P. 359–369. (In Russian).

3. Gavrilov B.Ja., Malysheva O.A. (2018) Sovershenstvovanie zashhity prav poterpevshego v stadii dosudebnogo rassledovanija // Juridicheskaja nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. No. 4(44). P. 119–125. (In Russian).

4. Andrejco S.Ju., Hazov E.N. (2021) Rol' instituta Upolnomochennyh po pravam cheloveka v mehanizme zashhity poterpevshih // Vestnik jekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti. No. 2. P. 46–52. (In Russian).

5. Morozova Ju.A., Kudrjavceva A.V. (2023) Jeffektivnost' realizacii prava poterpevshego na rassledovanie: processual'nye aspekty // Vestnik Juzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Pravo. V. 23. No. 2. P. 29–37.

6. Shipunova O.V. (2022) Osobennosti ohrany prav poterpevshih, umershih v hode rassledovanija ugolovnyh del // Juridicheskaja nauka i pravoohranitel'naja praktika. No. 1(59). P. 48–54. (In Russian).

7. Federal'nyj zakon ot 20 avgusta 2004 goda №119-FZ (v red. ot 01.07.2021 g.) «O gosudarstvennoj zashhite poterpevshih, svidetelej i inyh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2004. No. 34. P. 3534. (In Russian).

8. Filippova V.A. (2024) Sovremennye vyzovy v zashhite prav poterpevshih na stadii predvaritel'nogo sledstvija // Modern Science. No. 4–1. P. 54–58. (In Russian).

9. Golovachuk O.S. (2020) Aktual'nye aspekty ohrany prav poterpevshih po delam chastnogo obvinenija // Sudebnaja vlast' i ugolovnyj process. No. 1. P. 53–56.

10. Reshnjak M.G. (2021) Nekotorye aspekty sovershenstvovanija pravovogo mehanizma zashhity poterpevshih v ugolovnom processe // Viktimologija. V. 8. No. 2. P. 121–124. (In Russian).

11. Bektenov A.E., Omarova N.N. (2021) Analiz mehanizma Fonda kompensacii poterpevshim: pljusy i minusy // Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel'stva i pravovoj informacii Respubliki Kazahstan. No. 2(65). P. 142–150. (In Russian).

12. Abdulvaliev A.F. (2024) Konceptual'nye polozhenija o vkljuchenii gosudarstvennoj zashhity poterpevshego v sistemu ugolovno-processual'nyh principov // Viktimologija. V. 11. No. 1. P. 78–91. (In Russian).

13. Ibragimov I.M. (2014) Konfliktnye zony v zakonodatel'noj reglamentacii sostjazatel'nosti i garantij prav poterpevshego v sude // Rossijskoe gosudarstvovedenie. No. 3. P. 85–96. (In Russian).

14. Smagulov B., Sulejmenov E. (2024) Sravnitel'nyj analiz statusa zhertvy ugolovnogo prestuplenija v Kazahstane, Rossii i Germanii. Vestnik Uzhgorodskogo universiteta. No. 56. P. 20640–2070. (In Russian).

15. Zhumagulov T.B., Tynystanova S.S., Beisov E.Z., Seriyev B.A., Nurmaganbet, E.T. (2017) Institutions of direct democracy in people power implementation mechanism in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Man in India, v. 97, no. 6, pp. 159–169 (Q3). (In English).