Preview

Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law

Advanced search

Realization of the objectives of criminal punishment within the institution of conditional early release

https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-1-97-107

Abstract

This article examines the main principles of legislative codification of the  objectives of criminal punishment in the Criminal Code and the Criminal Executive Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The paper analyzes the views of a number of Soviet and post-Soviet researchers, including scholars from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan, regarding the content and punishment of criminal punishment. The concepts presented by the authors reflect the historically formed and currently generally accepted concept of the goals of punishment. At the same time, attention is drawn to existing contradictions in doctrine and law enforcement practice regarding their formulation, formulation, and implementation during the execution of punishment. The purpose of this study is to identify specific aspects of the legislative definition of punishment goals and analyze their potential impact on the sentencing and parole process. Furthermore, the study includes an analysis of the impact of punishment goals. The scientific significance of this study lies in its comprehensive analysis of the feasibility of implementing punishment goals during the parole process. Its practical significance lies in its exploration of the feasibility of appropriately applying punishment goals. The study utilized relevant methods and relevant legal frameworks.

About the Authors

N. E. Urbisinova
Turan University
Kazakhstan

Urbisinova N.E., Doctoral Student,

Almaty.



T. K. Akimzhanov
Turan University
Kazakhstan

Akimzhanov T.K., D.L.S., Professor,

Almaty.



B. M. Zhugralina
Turan University
Kazakhstan

Zhugralina B.M., C.L.S., Аssociate Professor,

Almaty.



L. A. Bukalerova
Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI)
Russian Federation

Bukalerova L.A., D.L.S., Professor,

Moscow.



References

1. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Qylmystyq kodeksi 2014 jylğy 3 şildedegı No. 226-V QRZ. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1400000231#z189/ (ötınış berılgen kün: 27.01.2026) (In Kazakh)

2. Dzhekebaev U.S. (2001) Osnovnye principy ugolovnogo prava Respubliki Kazahstan A.: Jetı jarğy. 216 p. (In Kazakh)

3. Bytko Ju.I. (2017) Spravedlivost’ i ugolovnaja politika: monografija. M.: Jurlit. Inform. 211 p. (In Russian)

4. Garland D. (1998) Sociological Perspectives on Punishment // Principled Sentencing. Oxford: Hard Publishing, р. 448. (In English)

5. Naumov A.V. (1996) Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaja chast’: kurs lekcij. M. 560 p. (In Russian)

6. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo: kurs lekcij. V. 2. Vladivostok, 1999. 642 p. (In Russian)

7. Sovremennoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaja i Osobennaja chasti: uchebnik. M.: Ileksa, 2007. 780 p. (In Russian)

8. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaja chast’. Nakazanie. Akademicheskij kurs. V. 1. M., 2021. 820 p. (In Russian)

9. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 29.12.2025). URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_/ (data obrashhenija: 27.01.2026) (In Russian)

10. Komar L., Nellis A., Budd K. Counting Down: Paths to a 20-year Maximum Prison Sentence. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project. 2023. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368533465_Counting_down_Paths_to_a_20-year_maximum_prison_sentence/ (accessed: 25.08.2025). (In English)

11. By Becky Feldman // The Second Look Movement: A Review of the Nation’s Sentence Review Laws. 2025. URL: https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/the-second-look-movement-a-review-of-the-nationssentence-review-laws/#footnote-ref-8/ (accessed: 25.08.2025). (In English)

12. O profilaktike pravonarushenij. Zakon RK ot 29 aprelja 2010 goda No. 271-IV. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z040000591_ (data obrashhenija: 24.03.2025) (In Russian)

13. Shnarbaev B.K. (2008) Nakazanie po ugolovnomu zakonodatel’stvu Respubliki Kazahstan: uchebnoe posobie. Astana: Institut zakonodatel’stva Respubliki Kazahstan. 106 p. (In Russian)

14. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Qylmystyq-atqaru kodeksı. 2014 jylğy 5 şıldedegı № 234-V QRZ. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1400000234 (ötınış berılgen kün: 24.05.2025) (In Kazakh)

15. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Bas prokuraturasynyñ Qūqyqtyq statistika jäne arnaiy esepke alu komitetınıñ esepterı: şartty türde merzımınen būryn bosağandar sany; sottardyñ qyzmetı turaly esepter; qylmystyq qudalau organynyñ negızgı körsetkışterı. URL: https://qamqor.gov.kz/crimestat//files/ (ötınış berılgen kün: 11.07.2025) (In Kazakh)

16. Itogi rabot za 1 polugodie 2025 goda Verhovnogo suda. URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=36262566 (data obrashhenija: 10.07.2025) (In Russian)

17. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Qylmystyq-prosestık kodeksi 2014 jylğy 4 şıldedegı. No. 231-V. URL: https://kodeksy-kz.com/ugolovno-protsessualnyj_kodeks.htm/ (ötınış berılgen kün: 24.01.2026) (In Kazakh)

18. Hegheș N-Е., Cristiean V. (2019) Conditional Liberation – One of the Measures to Achieve the Purpose of Criminal Punishment // RAIS Conference Proceedings. The 12th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences & Humanities. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3388041 (accessed: 24.12.2025) (In English)

19. Avdeev V.A. (2012) Istorija formirovanija instituta uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdenija. Irkutsk, 158 p. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Urbisinova N.E., Akimzhanov T.K., Zhugralina B.M., Bukalerova L.A. Realization of the objectives of criminal punishment within the institution of conditional early release. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2026;(1(14)):97-107. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-1-97-107

Views: 26

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2959-4197 (Print)
ISSN 2959-4200 (Online)