Preview

Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law

Advanced search

Theoretical foundations for improving the criminal legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its alignment with international standards

https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-1-215-224

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical foundations of criminal law reform in the Republic of Kazakhstan and its alignment with international legal standards. The authors identify key prerequisites for reform, including changes in the socio-political context, the emergence of new social relations, the need to integrate legal science achievements, the adaptation of international conventions, and the incorporation of advanced foreign legal practices. A distinction is made between legal improvement and full-scale reform, and the effectiveness of legislative changes is critically assessed. The paper evaluates the degree to which Kazakhstan’s criminal law complies with international norms and explores the reforms’ practical implications for legal policy and enforcement. Historical, comparative, and systemic research methods are employed. Special attention is given to institutional and substantive transformations within Kazakhstan’s criminal justice system, with recommendations for harmonizing domestic legislation with international legal standards.

About the Authors

S. M. Apienov
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Apienov S.M., С.L.S, Associated Professor,

Almaty.



L. B. Nyssanbekova
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Nyssanbekova L.B., Phd, Associated Professor,

Almaty.



Zh. Zhailau
Almaty Humanitarian-Economic University
Kazakhstan

Zhailau Zh., C.L.S., Associated Professor,

Almaty.



References

1. Bajmahanov M.T. (2003) Pravo, soznanie, povedenie // Izbrannye trudy po teorii gosudarstva i prava. Almaty: AJu-VShP «Әdіlet». Р. 138–144. (In Russian)

2. Ajthozhin K.K. (2017) Voprosy razvitija pravovoj sistemy Respubliki Kazahstan v kontekste realizacii koncepcii pravovoj politiki. URL: https://www.zakon.kz/4846104-voprosy-razvitija-pravovojj-sistemy.html (data obrashhenija: 25.02.2025) (In Russian)

3. Sulejmenova G.Zh. (2010) Sudebnaja reforma v Respublike Kazahstan: obzor osnovnyh jetapov // Organizacija po bezopasnosti i sotrudnichestvu v Evrope. Centr v Astane. Almaty. URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=36866416 (data obrashhenija: 29.05.2025) (In Russian)

4. Mämi Q. (2003) Qazaqstandağy sot reformasynyñ damu kezeñderı. Astana: Astana poligrafia. 264 р. (In Kazakh)

5. Dzhekebaev U.S. (2001) Osnovnye principy ugolovnogo prava Respubliki Kazahstan. – Almaty: Zhetі Zharғy. 256 р. (In Russian)

6. Pravovaja reforma. URL: https://ru.qaz.wiki/wiki/Law_reform (data obrashhenija: 23.04.2025) (In Russian)

7. Oganesjan S.M. (2008) Ponjatie mezhdunarodnyh standartov prav cheloveka // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. No. 2. Р. 56–60. (In Russian)

8. Butylin V.N., Goncharov I.V., Barbin V.V. (2007) Obespechenie prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v dejatel’nosti organov vnutrennih del. M.: Akademija upravlenija MVD Rossii. 240 р. (In Russian)

9. Rekomendacija № R(2000)21 Komiteta ministrov Soveta Evropy «O svobode osushhestvlenija professii advokata»: prinjata 25 okt. 2000 g. // Garant. URL: https://base.garant.ru/71493608/ (data obrashhenija: 19.12.2025) (In Russian)

10. Standarty nezavisimosti juridicheskoj professii: prinjaty na konferencii Mezhdunarodnoj associacii juristov (N’ju-Jork, sent. 1990 g.). // Zakon.kz: URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1045113 (data obrashhenija: 19.12.2025) (In Russian)

11. Model Rules of Professional Conduct – Primernye pravila professional’nogo povedenija / American Bar Association. 1983. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21208791 (data obrashhenija: 19.12.2025) (In English)

12. Advokattardyñ käsıbi ädep kodeksı: bekıtılgen 2014 jylğy 26 qyrküiektegı Advokattar alqasy delegattarynyñ ekınşı respublikalyq konferensiasynda. URL: https://www.agka.kz/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/CodexProfEtiki-KAZ.pdf (ötınış berılgen kün: 20.12.2025) (In Kazakh)

13. Erickson W.H. (1981) The Perjurious Defendant: A Proposed Solution to the Defense Lawyer’s Conflicting Ethical Obligations to the Court and to His Client // Denver Law Journal. Vol. 59. Iss. 1. P. 75–78. (In English)

14. Gafurov A.B. (2014) Mezhdunarodnye standarty advokatskoj dejatel’nosti. M., 240 р. (In Russian)

15. Relationship between Defense Lawyer and Defendant // Defense Wiki. URL: https://defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php/Relationship_between_Defense_Lawyer_and_Defendant (accessed: 23.08.2024) (In English)


Review

For citations:


Apienov S.M., Nyssanbekova L.B., Zhailau Zh. Theoretical foundations for improving the criminal legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its alignment with international standards. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2026;(1(14)):215-224. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-1-215-224

Views: 16

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2959-4197 (Print)
ISSN 2959-4200 (Online)