Peculiarities of investigating the basis and significance of evidence in legal proceedings
https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-1-29-35
Abstract
The article examines the features of the study of the foundations and significance of evidence in the framework of legal proceedings. The emphasis is on the analysis of conceptual and practical aspects of the collection, evaluation and use of evidence in court proceedings. The main focus is on the mechanisms of proof and criteria for evaluating evidence, as well as the impact of these factors on the fairness and effectiveness of judicial proceedings. Various types of evidence, including written, oral and material, and their role in ensuring justice are considered. Both traditional and modern approaches to evidence are analyzed, emphasizing the importance of adapting the legal system to changes in information technology and digitalization. The article focuses on the importance of observing procedural guarantees and protecting the rights of participants in the judicial process in the context of evidence. The article highlights in detail the issues of the legal nature and classification of evidence, discussing how different legal systems approach the definition and use of different types of evidence. Special attention is paid to the issues of due process and the establishment of the truth in court proceedings, as well as the role and importance of the presumption of innocence in the context of judicial evidence.
About the Authors
R. B. ТurysbekKazakhstan
PhD student
Аlmаty
A. K. Zhanibеkоv
Kazakhstan
PhD, associate professor
Аlmаty
References
1. Bentam I. (1976) O sudebnyh dokazatel'stvah / per s fr. I. Goronovich. Kiev, 440 p. (In Russian).
2. Bednjakov I.L. (2017) Teorija dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom processe. Samara: Samarskij juridicheskij institut FSIN Rossii, 152 p. (In Russian).
3. Povarnin S.I. (1923) Iskusstvo spora. O teorii i praktike spora. Petrograd, 73 p. (In Russian).
4. Dzjubenko A.A. (2008) O processual'noj samostojatel'nosti suda kak sub#ekta dokazyvanija (vzgljad praktikujushhego sud'i) // Rossijskij sud'ja. (In Russian).
5. Volkolup O.V. (2003) Sistema ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i problemy ee sovershenstvovanija, p. 25. (In Russian).
6. Pobedkin A.V. (2003) Nekotorye voprosy sobiranija dokazatel'stv // Gosudarstvo i pravo. No. 1. P. 61. (In Russian).
7. Korkunov N.M. (2010) Lekcii po obshhej teorii prava. M.: Rossijskaja politicheskaja jenciklopedija (ROSSPJeN), 520 p. (In Russian).
8. Vladimirov L.E. (2000) Uchenie ob ugolovnyh dokazatel'stvah. Tula: Avtograf, 464 p. (In Russian).
9. Grazhdanskij process. Uchebnik / pod red. V.A. Musina, N.A. Chechinoj, D.M. Chechota. M., 1996. 480 p. (In Russian).
10. Treushnikov M.K. (2004) Sudebnye dokazatel'stva. M.: Gorodec, 272 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Тurysbek R.B., Zhanibеkоv A.K. Peculiarities of investigating the basis and significance of evidence in legal proceedings. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2024;(1 (6)):29-35. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-1-29-35