Problematic issues of appointment and production forensic psychological and philological examination
https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-2-24-29
Abstract
The appointment and production of forensic psychological and philological examination research in Kazakhstan is carried out on the basis of a list of types of forensic examinations conducted by forensic examination bodies and expert specialties, qualifications for which are assigned by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The issue of the inadmissibility of raising legal issues before an expert in the theory of forensic examination is primarily related to the specifics of the expert’s competence and the subject of forensic examination. The article analyzes legal issues that do not fall within the competence of an expert philologist in the appointment and conduct of a forensic psychological and philological examination in cases of offenses committed verbally – defamation disputes, insults, incitement to discord. Recommended sample questions for these categories of cases are provided.
About the Authors
S. P. VarenikovaKazakhstan
Varenikova S.P., c.l.s., associate professor,
Almaty.
R. D. Каrymsakova
Kazakhstan
Каrymsakova R.D., c.ph.s., associate professor,
Almaty.
References
1. Ugolovnyj kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 3 ijulja 2014 goda No. 226 –V (s izmenenijami i dopolnenijami po sostojaniju na 02.03.2022 g.). 2022. (In Russian).
2. Koncepcija razvitija instituta sudebnoj jekspertizy Respubliki Kazahstan do 2023 goda. Prikaz Ministra justicii Respubliki Kazahstan ot 26 dekabrja 2018 goda No. 1629 «Ob utverzhdenii Koncepcii razvitija instituta sudebnoj jekspertizy Respubliki Kazahstan do 2023 goda i Plana meroprijatij po ee realizacii». (In Russian).
3. Perechen' vidov sudebnyh jekspertiz, provodimyh organami sudebnoj jekspertizy, i jekspertnyh special'nostej, kvalifikacija po kotorym prisvaivaetsja Ministerstvom justicii Respubliki Kazahstan. Utverzhden prikazom Ministra justicii Respubliki Kazahstan ot 27 marta 2017 goda No. 306. (In Russian).
4. Spravochnik dlja pravoohranitel'nyh organov i sudov po voprosam naznachenija sudebnyh jekspertiz v Centre sudebnoj jekspertizy Ministerstva justicii Respubliki Kazahstan. Astana, 2011. (In Russian).
5. Pravila organizacii i proizvodstva sudebnyh jekspertiz i issledovanij v organah sudebnoj jekspertizy, utverzhdennye prikazom ministra justicii Respubliki Kazahstan ot 27 aprelja 2017 goda No. 484. (In Russian).
6. Metodika issledovanija ob' ektov, soderzhashhih priznaki oskorblenija chesti, dostoinstva i lichnosti. 2007. (In Russian).
7. Metodika po proizvodstvu psihologo-filologicheskoj jekspertizy (na predmet provocirovanija jetnicheskoj, rasovoj, religioznoj i inoj neprijazni, pozvoljajushhej davat' pravovuju ocenku publichnym vyskazyvanijam i materialam sredstv massovoj informacii. 2008. (In Russian).
8. Normativnoe postanovlenie Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazahstan ot 26 nojabrja 2004 goda No. 16 «O sudebnoj jekspertize po ugolovnym delam». (In Russian).
9. Orlov Ju.K. (2001) Osnovy teorii dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom processe. M.: Prospekt. (In Russian).
10. Aver'janova T.V. (2015) Sudebnaja jekspertiza. Kurs obshhej teorii. M.: Norma. (In Russian).
11. Strogovich M.S. (1968) Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa. V. 1. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka». (In Russian).
12. Kokorev L.D., Kuznecov N.P. (1995) Ugolovnyj process: dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie. Voronezh: Izdvo Voronezh. un-ta. (In Russian).
13. Normativnoe postanovlenie Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazahstan ot 18 dekabrja 1992 g. No. 6 «O primenenii v sudebnoj praktike zakonodatel'stva o zashhite chesti, dostoinstva i delovoj reputacii fizicheskih i juridicheskih lic». (In Russian).
14. Galjashina E.I. (2021) Sudebnaja lingvisticheskaja jekspertiza: uchebnik. Moskva: Prospekt. (In Russian).
15. Kratkij spravochnik po sudebnoj filologicheskoj jekspertize po delam o vozbuzhdenii social'noj, nacional'noj, rodovoj, rasovoj, soslovnoj ili religioznoj rozni. Almaty, «Әdіl sөz», 2019. URL: http://www.adilsoz.kz/publication/show/id/43. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Varenikova S.P., Каrymsakova R.D. Problematic issues of appointment and production forensic psychological and philological examination. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2024;(2 (7)):24-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-2-24-29