Violation of environmental requirements when handling potentially hazardous chemical or biological substances from an environmental point of view

Environmental Protection is an urgent problem, and the life and health of today’s and future generations directly depends on its correct and timely solution. The purpose of this article is to draw specific conclusions by analyzing criminal offenses of violation of environmental requirements when working with environmentally potentially dangerous chemical or biological substances, for which liability is provided for by Article 325 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan [1]. The importance of the problems and goals raised in the study, the conclusions and recommendations contained in it make a certain contribution to the field of combating environmental criminal offenses, which is one of the chapters of the theory of criminal law. The methodology of the study is a complex of general scientific and individual scientific methods aimed at ensuring the validity and reliability of concepts in the course of the article. Practical value of the article conclusions made by the author within the framework of the study formulate proposals for amendments and additions to the norms of criminal law.

1. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Qylmystyq kodeksi. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Kodeksı: 2014 jyldyñ 3 şildesı, No. 226-V QRZ qabyldanğan. URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1400000226 (In Kazakh).

2. Borchashvili I.Sh. (2015) Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Respubliki Kazahstan. Osobennaja chast'. – Almaty: Zhetі Zharғy, V. 2. 1120 p. (In Russian).

3. Ağybaev A.N. (2000) Qylmystyq qūqyq. Erekşe bölım: oqulyq. – Almaty: Jetı jarğy, 520 p. (In Kazakh).

4. Kairzhanov E.I. (2008) Ob#ekt prestuplenija – interesy social'nyh sub#ektov: monografija. – Almaty: Jekonomika, 160 p. (In Russian).

5. Andreeva L.S. (2014) Ugolovnaja otvetstvennost' za narushenie pravil bezopasnosti pri obrashhenii s mikrobiologicheskimi libo drugimi biologicheskimi agentami ili toksinami: avtoref. ... kand. jurid. nauk: 12.00.08. M., 28 p. (In Russian).

6. Bushueva T.A. (1976) Obshhestvennaja opasnost' neostorozhnyh prestuplenij protiv prirodopol'zovanija // Problemy bor'by s prestupnoj neostorozhnost'ju v uslovijah nauchno-tehnicheskoj revoljucii: temat. sb. – Vladivostok: DVGU, 200 p. (In Russian).

7. Vinogradova E.V. Jekologicheskie prestuplenija: voprosy kvalifikacii i jurisdikcii. URL: http://www.rumvi.com/products. (In Russian).

8. Qauıptılık klasy. URL: https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (In Kazakh).

9. Dujunov V.K. i dr. (2005) Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii: (postatejnyj). – M.: Volters Kluver, 1104 p. (In Russian).

10. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii: prinjat 13 ijunja 1996 goda, No. 63-FZ (po sostojaniju na 24.09.2022). URL: http://logos-pravo.ru/ugolovnyy-kodeks-rf-uk-rf. (In Russian).

11. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii s kommentarijami. URL: http://stykrf.ru/247 (In Russian).

12. BQO ekologia departamentınıñ lauazymdy qyzmetkerlerıne qatysty tört qylmystyq ıs qozğaldy. URL: https://lenta.inform.kz/kz/article/2915881 (In Kazakh).

13. Kudrjavcev V.N. (1972) Obshhaja teorija kvalifikacii prestuplenij. M.: Jurid. lit., 352 p. (In Russian).