Claims of the tax authority against businesses for invalidation of transactions to exclude VAT and CIT offcets

The article analyzes the claims of the tax authorities of the Republic of Kazakhstan against businesses concerning the invalidation of transactions for the purpose of excluding VAT and CIT offsets. It outlines the legal framework used by the tax authorities to justify their claims, including civil and tax legislation, and explores the most common procedural and evidentiary issues. Particular attention is paid to the role of the Electronic Invoice Information System (ESF IS), which allows tax authorities to monitor and challenge business transactions remotely. The author highlights both the risks posed by such claims to the investment climate and the frequent legal shortcomings in the tax authorities’ arguments. The article also provides practical recommendations and defense strategies for businesses to resist unfounded tax claims, including the collection of documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and a clear legal position. The importance of distinguishing tax law violations from civil law obligations is emphasized. The conclusions contribute to improving legal awareness among businesses and strengthening the protection of taxpayer rights.

1. Toqaev Q.-J. Ädılettı Qazaqstan: zañ jäne tärtıp, ekonomikalyq ösım, halyqtyñ optimizmı atty Qazaqstan halqyna Joldauy. URL: https://www.akorda.kz/ (ötınış berılgen kün: 07.04.2025). (In Kazakh).

2. Sharipov D.S. (2023) Legal regulation of tax disputes in the Republic of Kazakhstan // Law and Time. No. 4. (In English).

3. Seitqasymov Ğ.S., Baimūhambetov S.B. (2020) Salyq jäne salyq salu negızderı. Almaty: Ekonomika. (In Kazakh).

4. Saparğaliev Ğ. (2021) Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ qūqyqtyq jüiesı. Almaty: Norm-Pres. (In Kazakh).

5. Popova L.Ju. (2022) Osparivanie sdelok nalogovymi organami: pravovye posledstvija // Nalogovedenie. No. 7. P. 98–106. (In Russian).

6. Artem’ev A.V. (2023) Kontrol’ nalogovyh organov za zakonnost’ju sdelok: sovremennye podhody // Finansovoe pravo. No. 9. P. 102–108. (In Russian).

7. Grazhdanskij processual’nyj kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 31 oktjabrja 2015 g. № 377-V ZRK // Jelektronnyj portal normativnyh pravovyh aktov Respubliki Kazahstan. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1500000377 (data obrashhenija: 29.04.2025). (In Russian).

8. Kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 25 dekabrja 2017 goda № 120-VI «O nalogah i drugih objazatel’nyh platezhah v bjudzhet» (Nalogovyj kodeks) // Jelektronnyj portal normativnyh pravovyh aktov Respubliki Kazahstan. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1700000120 (data obrashhenija: 29.04.2025). (In Russian).

9. Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan ot 6 janvarja 2012 goda № 527-IV «O nacional’noj bezopasnosti Respubliki Kazahstan» // Jelektronnyj portal normativnyh pravovyh aktov Respubliki Kazahstan. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z1200000527 (data obrashhenija: 29.04.2025). (In Russian).

10. Grazhdanskij kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan (Obshhaja chast’) ot 27 dekabrja 1994 g. № 268-XIII // Jelektronnyj portal normativnyh pravovyh aktov Respubliki Kazahstan. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K940001000_ (data obrashhenija: 29.04.2025). (In Russian).

11. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazahstan ot 7 ijulja 2016 goda № 6 «O nekotoryh voprosah nedejstvitel’nosti sdelok i primenenija sudami posledstvij ih nedejstvitel’nosti» // Jelektronnyj portal normativnyh pravovyh aktov Respubliki Kazahstan. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P1600000006 (data obrashhenija: 29.04.2025). (In Russian).

12. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazahstan ot 29 ijunja 2017 goda № 4 «O sudebnoj praktike primenenija nalogovogo zakonodatel’stva» // Jelektronnyj portal normativnyh pravovyh aktov Respubliki Kazahstan. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P1700000004 (data obrashhenija: 29.04.2025). (In Russian).

13. Olmedo J.G. (2023) The fragmentation of international investment and tax dispute settlement: A good idea? // Leiden Journal of International Law. V. 36. No. 3. P. 617–642. (In English).

14. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazahstan ot 22 dekabrja 2022 goda № 9 «O nekotoryh voprosah primenenija sudami nalogovogo zakonodatel’stva» // Jelektronnyj portal normativnyh pravovyh aktov Respubliki Kazahstan. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2200000009 (data obrashhenija: 29.04.2025). (In Russian).

15. Nias P. (2024) Prevention and resolution of international tax disputes: The use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques including mediation // In: Mooij H. (ed.) International Tax Disputes: Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management. London: Edward Elgar Publishing. P. 105–120. (In English).

16. Mooij H. (2024) International Tax Disputes: Arbitration, Mediation, and Dispute Management. London: Edward Elgar Publishing. (In English).

17. Haslehner W., Lyons T. (2023) Alternative Dispute Resolution and Tax Disputes. – London: Edward Elgar Publishing. (In English).

18. Noonan C. (2023) Swimming Against the Tide? The Arbitration of International Tax Disputes // Indian Journal of International Economic Law. V. 14. Iss. 1. Art. 3. (In English).

19. Kofler G., Rust A. (2023) Tax Dispute Resolution Directive: an EU wide framework expanding beyond transfer pricing // In: Mooij H., Lyons T. (eds.) Alternative Dispute Resolution and Tax Disputes. London: Edward Elgar Publishing. Chapter 5. P. 103–129. (In English).

20. Khorsandi P. (2024) The future of tax dispute resolution: Trends and predictions // Forbes Business Council. July 5. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2024/07/05/the-future-of-taxdispute-resolution-trends-and-predictions/ (date of request: 29.04.2025). (In English).