Institutionalization of digital litigation costs as a subcategory of court expenses in the context of judicial digitalization

In the context of accelerated judicial digitalization, not only the procedural form but also the economic structure of court activity is transforming. The use of online hearings, electronic document management, digital evidence, and remote participation platforms generates new categories of expenses not covered by the traditional model of court costs. The existing civil procedural framework, based on the dual division between state duty and litigation expenses, fails to reflect technology-driven expenditures, creating a regulatory gap between digital practice and legal regulation. The purpose of this study is to develop a coherent doctrinal model of digital litigation costs and to determine their place within the system of procedural expenses. The methodological framework combines systemic, functional, and comparative legal approaches, together with analysis of judicial practice. It is argued that expenses related to internet traffic, digital platforms, technical support for remote participation, and electronic evidence possess the characteristics of litigation costs and should be subject to procedural compensation. The novelty of the research lies in conceptualizing digital litigation costs as a distinct subtype of litigation expenses and defining clear criteria for their qualification.

1. Petrov I.V., Kudrjavceva L.V. Aktual’nye voprosy cifrovizacii rossijskogo pravosudija. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktualnye-voprosy-tsifrovizatsii-rossiyskogo-pravosudiya/viewer (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026) (In Russian)

2. Novaja redakcija Grazhdanskogo processual’nogo kodeksa: optimizacija sudebnyh rashodov. URL: https://sud.gov.kz/rus/massmedia/novaya-redakciya-grazhdanskogo-processualnogo-kodeksa-optimizaciyasudebnyh-rashodov?utm_source (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026) (In Russian)

3. Stat’ja 108 Grazhdanskogo processual’nogo kodeksa Respubliki Kazahstan ot 31.10. 2015 No. 377-V ZRK. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1500000377 (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026) (In Russian)

4. Kononov D.A. (2025) Jelektronnoe pravosudie v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe v uslovijah cifrovizacii. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnoe-pravosudie-v-grazhdanskom-i-arbitrazhnom-protsesse-v-usloviyah-tsifrovizatsii/viewer (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026) (In Russian)

5. Tіlepova Zh.S. (26.05.2017) Sudebnye rashody // Informacionnaja sistema «Paragraf». URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=34352511 (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026). (In Russian)

6. O vzyskanii sudebnyh rashodov // Press-sluzhba Juzhno-Kazahstanskogo oblastnogo suda. 11.11.2014. URL: https://sud.gov.kz/rus/news/o-vzyskanii-sudebnyh-rashodov (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026). (In Russian)

7. Zateeva D.A. Jelektronnye dokazatel’stva v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve v jepohu cifrovizacii pravosudija: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnyedokazatelstva-v-grazhdanskom-sudoproizvodstve-v-epohu-tsifrovizatsii-pravosudiya-teoreticheskie-iprakticheskie-aspekty/viewer (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026) (In Russian)

8. 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard (section on digitalisation – item 3.2.4 “Digitalisation”) URL: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/upholding-rule-law/eujustice-scoreboard_en (accessed: 15.01.2026) (In English)

9. UNCITRAL Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution (2017, English, PDF). URL: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/v1700382_english_technical_notes_on_odr.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2026) (In English)

10. BaickerMcKee S. (2015) The Award of EDiscovery Costs to the Prevailing Party: An Analog Solution in a Digital World / Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3108522 (accessed: 15.01.2026) (In English)

11. What Courts Consider When Deciding EDiscovery Cost Awards / Los Angeles Lawyer, October 2014. URL: https://www.robinskaplan.com/assets/htmldocuments/uploads/pdfs/8f8e92a33917473e8d2952ff2a6138 cc__what-courts-consider-when-deciding-e-discovery-cost.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2026) (In English)

12. The Cost of Producing Electronic Documents in Civil Lawsuits Can They Be Sharply Reduced Without Sacrificing Quality? Nicholas M. Pace, Laura Zakaras Research Summary Published Apr 11, 2012. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9650.html?utm_source (accessed: 15.01.2026) (In English)

13. Reshenie arbitrazhnogo suda Samarskoj oblasti ot 20 ijulja 2023 g. Delo №A55-10132/2022, «Tjumenskoe proektnoe bjuro» vs «Samaraneftegeofizika». URL: https://pravo.ru/story/255156/ (data obrashhenija: 24.02.2026); URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/dca15470-e3ff-40bb-a251-a3bb6e7989dc/b4c0f8d8-875f-44db-92d3-f7c1f6361952/A55-10132-2022_20240822_Opredelenie.pdf?isAddStamp=True (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026) (In Russian)

14. Code of Civil Procedure, Germany, Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO), amended up to Act of 24 October 2024. URL: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/legislation/details/23180?utm_source (accessed: 15.01.2026) (In English)

15. Rule 26 – Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26?utm_source (accessed: 15.01.2026) (In English)

16. Rule 54(d) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_54?utm_source (accessed: 15.01.2026) (In English)

17. Cifrovoj kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 09 janvarja 2026 g. No. 255-VIII ZRK. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K2600000255/info?utm_source=chatgpt.com (data obrashhenija: 15.01.2026) (In Russian)