International legal regulation of online labor: principles and key features

This study analyzes the principles of international legal regulation of online labor and their distinguishing features from traditional forms of employment, with a particular focus on their applicability and relevance to Kazakhstan. The paper examines key aspects of online labor regulation, including fair treatment, non-discrimination, occupational safety, the right to association, confidentiality and data protection, as well as the challenges of classifying digital platform workers. The research highlights the transnational nature of online labor and the jurisdictional challenges that arise as a result. The research methodology is based on a comprehensive analysis of international legal norms, academic literature, and law enforcement practice. The findings of the study indicate the need to adapt existing legal regulatory mechanisms to the specific requirements of the digital economy, as well as to develop new and innovative approaches to the legal regulation of online labor relations in Kazakhstan. The research results make it possible to formulate a set of concrete recommendations aimed at further improving the labor legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, taking into account international principles and best practices in the field of legal regulation of online labor relations.

1. Berg J., Furrer M., Harmon E., Rani U., Silberman M.S. (2018) Digital labour platforms and the future of work: Towards decent work in the online world. Geneva: International Labour Organization. URL: https://www.ilo.org/publications/digital-labour-platforms-and-future-work-towards-decent-work-online-world (accessеd: 21.12.2025) (In English)

2. Bolger v. Amazon.com, LLC // Apelljacionnyj sud shtata Kalifornija. 2020. Sudebnoe reshenie. URL: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-court-of-appeal/2080950.html. (In English)

3. Ajunwa I., Crawford K., Schultz J. (2016) Limitless worker surveillance // California Law Review. Vol. 105. No. 3. P. 735–776. (In English)

4. De Stefano V. (2016) The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy // Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal. Vol. 37. No. 3. P. 471–504. (In English)

5. Johnston H., Land-Kazlauskas C. (2018) Organizing on-demand: Representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy. Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 94. Geneva: International Labour Office. 72 p. (In English)

6. Ajunwa I., Crawford K., Schultz J. (2017) Limitless worker surveillance // California Law Review. Vol. 105. No. 3. P. 735–776. (In English)

7. Kalleberg A.L., Dunn M. (2016) Good jobs, bad jobs in the gig economy // Perspectives on Work. Vol. 20. No. 1–2. P. 10–14. (In English)

8. Cherry M.A., Aloisi A. (2017) Dependent contractors in the gig economy: A comparative approach // American University Law Review. Vol. 66. No. 3. P. 635–689. (In English)

9. Graham M., Hjorth I., Lehdonvirta V. (2017) Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods // Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 135–162. (In English)

10. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Eñbek kodeksı. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1500000414 (ötınış berılgen kün: 21.12.2025) (In Kazakh)

11. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Konstitusiasy. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K950001000_ (ötınış berılgen kün: 21.12.2025) (In Kazakh)

12. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ Azamattyq kodeksı (Jalpy bölım). URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K940001000_ (ötınış berılgen kün: 21.12.2025) (In Kazakh)

13. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ «Käsiptik odaqtar turaly» Zañy. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/Z1400000211 (ötınış berılgen kün: 21.12.2025) (In Kazakh)