On the concept and subjects of the official interpretation of the rules of law
https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2023-1-2-5-11
Abstract
The article is devoted to one of the most important problems of the general theory of law. The issues of official interpretation of law, despite the relatively greater development in the soviet and modern legal literature of the Republic of Kazakhstan and other states of the post-soviet space, nevertheless, remain relevant. The legislation of our country rather ambiguously and controversially defines the concept and subjects of the official interpretation of laws and other regulatory legal acts, giving rise to some contradictions in the laws themselves and thereby causing an arbitrary interpretation of legislative norms by law enforcement agencies, organizations and citizens. And this is a direct path to arbitrariness, violation of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities, as well as the state itself and society as a whole. In this regard, the author of this work made an attempt to comprehend this problem from scientific positions and give his own vision of its solution.
About the Author
L. Т. Zhanuzakova
The research Institute of law «Turan» University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
d.l.s., professor
Almaty
References
1. Teorija gosudarstva i prava: Kurs lekcij / Pod red. N.I. Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurist#, 2001. – 776 p. (In Russian).
2. Nersesjanc V.S. Obshhaja teorija prava i gosudarstva. M.: INFRA-M, 1999. 552 p. (In Russian).
3. Konstitucija Respubliki Kazahstan. Prinjata na respublikanskom referendume 30 avgusta 1995 g. S izmenenijami i dopolnenijami, vnesennymi zakonami RK ot 7 oktjabrja 1998 g., ot 21 maja 2007 g., ot 2 fevralja 2011 g., ot 10 marta 2017 g., ot 23 marta 2019 g., ot 8 ijunja 2022 g., ot 17 sentjabrja 2022 g. // Vedomosti Parlamenta RK. 1996. No. 4. St. 217; 1998. No. 20. St. 245; 2007. No.10. St. 68; 2011. No. 3. St. 29; 2017. No. 5. St. 9; 2019. No. 5–6. St. 28; Kazahstanskaja pravda – 2022. 8 ijunja, 19 sentjabrja. (In Russian).
4. Konstitucionnyj zakon RK ot 5 nojabrja 2022 g. «O Konstitucionnom Sude Respubliki Kazahstan» // Informacionno-pravovaja sistema normativnyh pravovyh aktov RK «Әdіlet» // adilet.zan.kz. (In Russian).
5. Konstitucionnyj zakon RK ot 25 dekabrja 2000 g. «O sudebnoj sisteme i statuse sudej Respubliki Kazahstan» // Vedomosti Parlamenta RK. 2000. No. 23. St. 410. (In Russian).
6. Zakon RK ot 6 aprelja 2016 g. «O pravovyh akta» // Vedomosti Parlamenta RK. 2016. No. 7-I. St. 46. (In Russian).
7. Zakon RK ot 24 marta 1998 g. «O normativnyh pravovyh aktah» (utratil silu) // Vedomosti Parlamenta RK. 1998. No. 2–3. St. 25. (In Russian).
8. Konstitucija Respubliki Kazahstan ot 28 janvarja 1993 g. // adilet.zan.kz. (In Russian).
9. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Soveta RK ot 28 oktjabrja 1996 g. No. 6/2 «Ob oficial'nom tolkovanii punkta 1 stat'i 4 i punkta 2 stat'i 12 Konstitucii Respubliki Kazahstan» // Informacionno-pravovaja sistema normativnyh pravovyh aktov RK «Әdіlet» // adilet.zan.kz Oxford English Dictionary. Sixth edition. (In Russian).
10. Oxford University Press, 2001, 2002, 2005, 2006. London. (In English).
11. Vlasenko N.A. (2011) Teorija gosudarstva i prava. M.: Prospekt, 416 p. (In Russian).
12. Sapargaliev G.S. (1998) Konstitucionnoe pravo Respubliki Kazahstan. – Almaty: Zhety zhargy, 336 p.
13. Sabikenov S.N. (2005) Problemy povyshenija statusa i polnomochij Parlamenta Respubliki Kazahstan kak vysshego predstavitel'nogo organa gosudarstva // Perspektivy kazahstanskogo parlamentarizma kak vazhnejshego instituta demokratizacii i ustojchivogo razvitija strany / Materialy mezhd. nauchno-prakt. konf., 27 maja 2005 g. Astana. P. 150–157. (In Russian).
14. Kotov A.K. (2000) Konstitucionalizm v Kazahstane: opyt stanovlenija i jeffektivnost' mehanizma vlasti. Almaty: KazGJuA, 288 p. (In Russian).
15. Abdrasulov E.B. (2002) Tolkovanie zakona i norm Konstitucii: teorija, opyt, procedura. Almaty: Өrkeniet, 400 p. (In Russian).
16. Abdrasulov E.B. (2003) Tolkovanie zakona i norm Konstitucii: teorija, opyt, procedura / Avtoref. diss…dokt. jurid. nauk. Almaty, 50 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Zhanuzakova L.Т. On the concept and subjects of the official interpretation of the rules of law. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2023;(2 (3)):5-11. https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2023-1-2-5-11
Views:
402
Email this article 