Speech Manipulation in Public Speeches: A Methodology for the Linguistic Expert Analysis of Disputed Texts
https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-2-354-361
Abstract
This article examines speech manipulation within media texts and provides a structured framework for its identification in forensic linguistic practice. The study addresses the rising conflict potential in modern public communication, which demands more precise, context-sensitive tools to interpret controversial statements that impact public opinion and social reputation. A critical review of both domestic and international research highlights existing methodological gaps and underscores the importance of an integrated approach – one that combines semantic, pragmalinguistic, and discourse analysis. Using a public video address as a case study, the research demonstrates how specific linguistic mechanisms of influence operate under real-world pragmatic conditions. The study establishes a systematic set of criteria to help experts qualify manipulative speech by analyzing its semantic structure, intent, and context. These findings offer practical utility for forensic linguistic expertise, particularly when distinguishing between verifiable factual claims and subjective value judgments in legal disputes.
About the Authors
Н. M. ТomanovKazakhstan
c.ph.s., associate professor
Almaty
К. Z. Zhappar
Kazakhstan
c.ph.s., research professor
Almaty
A. S. Buzelo
Kazakhstan
с.ph.s,, professor
Almaty
L. Aldabergenkyzy
Kazakhstan
master in transl. studies, senior lecturer
Almaty
References
1. Kukushkina O.V. (2016) Negativnaja informacija: utverzhdenie o fakte ili vyrazhenie mnenija? // Teorija i praktika sudebnoj jekspertizy. No. 3 (43). P. 132–146. (In Russian)
2. Kukushkina O.V. (2016) Metody analiza, primenjaemye v sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj jekspertize // Teorija i praktika sudebnoj jekspertizy. No.1 (41). P. 118–126. (In Russian)
3. Bykova O.N. (1998) K voprosu o jazykovoj manipuljacii v sredstvah massovoj informacii // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty rechevogo obshhenija. Vyp.6. Krasnojarsk-Achinsk. P. 18–22. (In Russian)
4. Docenko E.L. (2000) Psihologija manipuljacii: fenomeny, mehanizmy i zashhita. M.: CheRo: Izd-vo MGU. 344 p. (In Russian)
5. Karasik V.I. (2002) Jazyk social’nogo statusa: sociolingvisticheskij, pragmalingvisticheskij i lingvosemanticheskij aspekty. M.: Gnozis. 333 p. (In Russian)
6. Kopnina G.A. (2003) Jeticheskaja norma i problemy rechevogo manipulirovanija // Rusistika na poroge XXI veka: problemy i perspektivy: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. M. P. 252–254. (In Russian)
7. Kara-Murza S.G. (2005). Manipuljacija soznaniem. M.: Jeksmo. 832 p. (In Russian)
8. Van Dijk T.A. (2006) Discourse and manipulation // Discourse & Society. Vol. 17. No. 3. P. 359–383. (In English)
9. Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman, 1995. 265 p. (In English)
10. Karasik V.I. (2000) Struktura institucional’nogo diskursa // Problemy rechevoj kommunikacii: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 1. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta. P. 25–33. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Тomanov M., Zhappar К.Z., Buzelo A.S., Aldabergenkyzy L. Speech Manipulation in Public Speeches: A Methodology for the Linguistic Expert Analysis of Disputed Texts. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2026;(2(15)):354-361. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-2-354-361
JATS XML
