Роль цифровой криминалистики в уголовных расследованиях в Республике Казахстан

В исследовании рассматривается роль цифровой криминалистики в уголовных расследованиях Казахстана, с акцентом на то, как собираются, анализируются и используются цифровые доказательства, такие как записи с камер видеонаблюдения, данные мобильных устройств и контент социальных сетей. На основе анализа нормативных документов, примеров из практики и правовых рамок подчеркивается расширяющееся применение технологий наблюдения, искусственного интеллекта и больших данных как в предотвращении преступлений, так и в обеспечении государственного контроля. Хотя цифровая криминалистика повышает возможности борьбы с киберпреступностью и мошенничеством, ее использование для мониторинга политического инакомыслия вызывает обеспокоенность в отношении гражданских свобод. В исследовании также выявлены основные правовые, технические и институциональные проблемы, влияющие на достоверность и допустимость цифровых доказательств в суде, включая расплывчатость законодательства, непоследовательность процедур и недостаточный регуляторный контроль. Работа вносит как практический, так и теоретический вклад в обсуждение цифровой криминалистики в переходных правовых системах. В качестве рекомендаций предлагается совершенствование стандартов доказательств, проведение правовой реформы и укрепление институционального потенциала, а также повышение прозрачности и этического контроля в области цифровой криминалистики.

1. Walcott S., Muir R. Unleashing the value of digital forensics (Commissioned by the Transforming Forensics Programme), London: The Police Foundation, 2021. URL: https://www.police-foundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/value_of_digital_forensics.pdf (accessed: 28.03.2026)

2. INTERPOL. Global guidelines for digital forensics laboratories, Lyon: INTERPOL Global Complex for Innovation. 2019. URL: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/13501/file/INTERPOL_DFL_GlobalGuidelinesDigitalForensicsLaboratory.pdf (accessed: 28.03.2026)

3. Petrenko E.S., Shevyakova A.L. Features and perspectives of digitization in Kazakhstan, Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT. 2019, pp. 889–899. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_91 (accessed: 28.03.2026)

4. Stickings M., Nosal J. Blunting the cutting edge of crime: OSCE helps combat cybercrime in Central Asia [Blog post], Vienna: OSCE – Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 2024. URL: https://www.osce.org/blog/574757 (accessed: 28.03.2026)

5. 6Wresearch. Kazakhstan digital forensics market (2024–2030) [Market research report], 6Wresearch. 2024. URL:: https://www.6wresearch.com/industry-report/kazakhstan-digital-forensics-market (accessed: 28.03.2026)

6. Pollitt M. A history of digital forensics, Advances in Digital Forensics VI: Sixth IFIP WG 11.9 International Conference on Digital Forensics, Hong Kong, China, January 4–6, 2010, Revised Selected Papers 6. 2010, pp. 3–15. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-15506-2_1

7. Selim A., Ali İ. The role of digital forensic analysis in modern investigations // Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies. 2024, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–5. DOI: 10.57020/ject.1445625

8. Dubey H., Bhatt S., Negi L. Digital forensics techniques and trends: a review // International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 2023, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 644–654. DOI: 10.34028/iajit/20/4/11

9. Granja F.M., Rafael G.D.R. The preservation of digital evidence and its admissibility in the court // International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics. 2017, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1504/IJESDF.2017.081749

10. Yeboah-Ofori A., Brown A.D. Digital forensics investigation jurisprudence: issues of admissibility of digital evidence // Journal of Forensic, Legal & Investigative Sciences. 2020, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.24966/FLIS-733X/100045

11. Antwi-Boasiako A., Venter H. A model for digital evidence admissibility assessment, Advances in Digital Forensics XIII: 13th IFIP WG 11.9 International Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, January 30–February 1, 2017, Revised Selected Papers 13. 2017, pp. 23–38. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67208-3_2

12. ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 27037:2012 – Information technology – Security techniques – Guidelines for identification, collection, acquisition and preservation of digital evidence, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. 2012. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/44381.html (accessed: 28.03.2026)

13. ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 27041:2015 – Information technology – Security techniques – Guidelines on assuring suitability and adequacy of incident investigative method, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. 2015. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/44445.html (accessed: 28.03.2026)

14. ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 27042:2015 – Information technology – Security techniques – Guidelines for the analysis and interpretation of digital evidence, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. 2015. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/44446.html

15. Saniyazova Y., Mediyev R., Saitova E., Utegenova G., Kzylkhojayeva A. Advancing forensic science in Kazakhstan: the emergence and impact of digital forensics in cybercrime investigation, Law, State & Telecommunications Review / Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações. 2024, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 48–68. DOI: 10.26512/lstr.v16i2.49190

16. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. On the approval of the Concept of digital transformation, development of the information and communication technology industry, and cybersecurity for 2023–2029 (Resolution No. 269). Әділет. 2023. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2300000269 (accessed: 28.03.2026)

17. Minister of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Order No. 484 on approval of the Rules for the organization and conduct of forensic examinations and research in forensic examination agencies. 2017. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1700015180 (accessed: 28.03.2026)

18. Council of Europe. Joining the Convention on Cybercrime: Benefits (Version 1). 2025, URL: https://rm.coe.int/cyber-buda-benefits-2025-1-april-en/1680b51696 (accessed: 28.03.2026)

19. Council of Europe. Octopus Project: Authorities of Kazakhstan coordinate on the next steps to complete accession to the Convention on Cybercrime. 2024. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/-/octopusproject-authorities-of-kazakhstan-coordinate-on-the-next-steps-to-complete-accession-to-the-convention-oncybercrime (accessed: 28.03.2026)

20. Yin R.K. Case study research and applications: design and methods, 6th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2018, 352 p. URL: https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/case-study-research-andapplications-6-250150 (accessed: 28.03.2026)

21. Turgel I., Bozhko L., Ulyanova E., Khabdullin A. Implementation of the smart city technology for environmental protection management of cities: the experience of Russia and Kazakhstan // Environmental and Climate Technologies. 2019, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 148–165. DOI: 10.2478/rtuect-2019-0061

22. Doszhanova A.B., Begaliyev Y.N. Information and communication technologies of the “Smart City” in the system of identification: forensic aspect // Bulletin of the Karaganda University “Law Series”. 2025, vol. 30, no. 2(118), pp. 125–133, DOI: 10.31489/2025L2/125-133

23. Amnesty International. Think before you post: Closing down social media space in Kazakhstan (EUR 57/5644/2017). 2017. URL: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur57/5644/2017/en/ (accessed: 28.03.2026)

24. Amnesty International. Kazakhstan: Authorities must drop politically motivated charges against satirical blogger, Amnesty International. 2025. URL: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/02/kazakhstanauthorities-must-drop-politically-motivated-charges-against-satirical-blogger/ (accessed: 28.03.2026)

25. Lakbayev K.S., Rysmagambetova G.M., Umetov A.U., Sysoyev A.K. The crimes in the field of high technology: concept, problems and methods of counteraction in Kazakhstan // International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics. 2020, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 412–423. DOI: 10.1504/IJESDF.2020.110651

26. Adanbekova Z.N., Omarova A.B., Yermukhametova S. R., Khudaiberdina G.A., Tynybekov S.T. Features of the conclusion of a civil transaction on the internet // International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics. 2022, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 19–36. DOI: 10.1504/IJESDF.2022.120035

27. Beisbekova G.K., Konussova V.T., Ismagulov K.E., Saktaganova I.S., Mukasheva A.A. Problems of concretization of legal norms in Kazakhstan // Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2019, vol. 10, no. 1(39), pp. 52–57. DOI: 10.14505//jarle.v10.1(39).07

28. Council of Europe. Kazakhstan invited to accede to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, Council of Europe. 2023. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/news/-/asset_publisher/S73WWxscOuZ5/content/id/216084174 (accessed: 28.03.2026)