Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: reciprocity and public policy
Abstract
In this article, I would like to stay on the study of such aspects of the problem, as reciprocity, and public policy. The situation today in kazakhstani practice, obviously, that raised questions, in particular the question of contradiction to the public policy, are more theoretical. However, such ground, as a contradiction to the public policy, is widely used in international practice as grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award. Moreover, understanding of these problems can enhance the understanding the nature of arbitration in general.
References
1. Konvencija o priznanii i privedenii v ispolnenie inostrannyh arbitrazhnyh reshenij. (N'ju-Jork, 10 ijunja 1958 g.) URL: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/ru/new-yorkconvention-r.pdf (In Russian).
2. Bantekas I. The Private Dimension of the International Customary Nature of Commercial Arbitration // Journal of International Arbitration. 2008. Issue 4. R. 449–460. URL: https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/25.4/JOIA2008033 (In English).
3. Lemenda trading Co. ltd. v. African Middle East petroleum ltd. 1988. QB 448 URL: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/D-016-8122?originationContext=document&transitionType=PLDocumentLink&contextData=(sc.Default) (In English).
Review
For citations:
Sarina S.A. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: reciprocity and public policy. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2022;(1):102-108. (In Russ.)
Views:
148
Email this article 