Civil law transactions as a means of committing fraud
https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2025-1-3-111-121
Abstract
The article discusses the most frequently used cases of civil transactions as a means of fraud specified in Article 190 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In particular, the issues of distinguishing between fraud in the field of entrepreneurial activity and non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of contractual obligations are raised, effective ways to solve them correctly are sought, and specific proposals are made. In the course of the study, civil law transactions were identified as ways to commit fraud, and the issues of the close relationship of fraud with Civil Law relations were raised. The relevance of this topic lies in the fact that, without actually doing business, but with the aim of embezzlement of other people’s property, fraudsters deceive victims by concluding civil law contracts for the sale of goods, the performance of work, the provision of services, abuse their trust and evade criminal liability and punishment provided for fraud themselves. Despite the increasing number of cases of illegal legal appropriation of other people’s property through the conclusion of civil law contracts, deception of the owner by fraudsters and abuse of his trust for the implementation of a criminal game, at the moment there are no complaints or reports of citizens about fraud, on the basis of which criminal cases under Article 190 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan remain unsolved and not investigated. The work examined the judicial practice of civil cases for non-fulfillment or improper performance of contractual obligations and criminal cases for fraud. Mistakes made in the activities of criminal prosecution bodies and the court were reflected. Recommendations have been developed to improve forensic investigative practice and improve the efficiency of criminal prosecution bodies and the court.
About the Authors
M. A. UtanovKazakhstan
d.l.s., associate professor
Astana
B. T. Aueshova
Kazakhstan
c.l.s., associate professor
Aktau
E. O. Toilybekova
Kazakhstan
PhD, associate professor
Kyzylorda
E. B. Ablaeva
Kazakhstan
c.l.s., associate professor
Almaty
References
1. 2018–2024 jyldar kezeñındegı Qazaqstan Respublikasyndağy qylmystyñ jai-küiı turaly statistikalyq derekter. Qūqyq qorğau organdary qyzmetınıñ negızgı körsetkışterı turaly aqparat. Qol jetımdılık «Ädılet» aqparattyq-qūqyqtyq jüiesımen qamtamasyz etılgen. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/P170000006S (ötınış berılgen kün: 25.05.2025). (In Kazakh).
2. Alaiaqtyq turaly ıster boiynşa sot praktikasy. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Joğarğy Sotynyñ 2017 jylğy 29 mausymdağy № 6 normativtık qaulysy. URL: https://qamqor.gov.kz/crimestat/indicators (ötınış berılgen kün: 25.05.2025). (In Kazakh).
3. Setiawan C.E., Suwarti Nam Rumkel (2021) Analysis of Fraud in Civil on Agreements Resulting in Default // Journal of Social Science, no. 2(6), pp. 760–770. (In English).
4. Egzonis Hajdari, Fulya Erlüle (2018) Elements, Types and Consequences of Fraud according to Obligation Law – A comparative approach between legislation in Turkey and Kosovo // International Comparative Jurisprudence, no. 4(2), pp. 163–177. (In English).
5. Kiseleva I.A. (2013) Kriterii razgranichenija moshennichestva v sfere predprinimatel’skoj dejatel’nosti i grazhdansko-pravovogo delikta // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. No. 3(2). P. 87–90. (In Russian).
6. Shumov R.N. (2003) Moshennichestvo v sfere arendy zhil’ja // Jurist. No. 3. P. 35–40. (In Russian).
7. Qylmystyq-prosestık kodeks. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ 2014 jylğy 4 şıldedegı No. 231-V QRZ zañy. Qol jetımdılık «Ädılet» aqparattyq-qūqyqtyq jüiesımen qamtamasyz etılgen. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1400000231 (ötınış berılgen kün: 25.05.2025). (In Kazakh).
8. Smailova I.M. (2012) K voprosu o mezhotraslevoj konkurencii ugolovnogo i grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva pri kvalifikacii moshennichestva // Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel’stva Respubliki Kazahstan. No. 3(27). P. 170–175. (In Russian).
9. Azamattyq kodeks. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ 1994 jylğy 27 jeltoqsandağy No. 268-HIII zañy. Qol jetımdılık «Ädılet» aqparattyq-qūqyqtyq jüiesımen qamtamasyz etılgen. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K940001000_(ötınış berılgen kün: 25.05.2025). (In Kazakh).
10. Azamattyq prosestık kodeks. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ 2015 jylğy 31 qazandağy No. 377-V QRZ zañy. Qol jetımdılık «Ädılet» aqparattyq-qūqyqtyq jüiesımen qamtamasyz etılgen. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K1500000377 (ötınış berılgen kün: 26.05.2025). (In Kazakh).
11. «O vnesenii izmenenij v Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii i Ugolovno-processual›nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii po voprosam sovershenstvovanija osnovanij i porjadka osvobozhdenija ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti»: Federal›nyj zakon ot 03.07.2016 No. 323-FZ. Dostup predostavlen informacionno-poiskovoj sistemoj «Konsul’tant Pljus». URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_200696/ (data obrashhenija: 26.05.2025). (In Russian).
12. Reshenie Alatauskogo rajonnogo suda goroda Almaty ot 10 maja 2023 goda po grazhdanskomu delu No. 7575-23-00-2/621 o vzyskanii denezhnyh sredstv: sudebnye akty. Dostup predostavlen edinym oknom «Sudebnyj kabinet» dlja dostupa k jelektronnym servisam sudebnyh organov Respubliki Kazahstan. Rezhim dostupa: dlja zaregistrirovannyh pol’zovatelej. URL: https://office.sud.kz/new/ (data obrashhenija: 30.05.2025). (In Russian).
13. Kusainov D.Sh. (2015) Osobennosti pervonachal’nogo jetapa rassledovanija moshennichestva v sfere zhilishhnyh otnoshenij // Vestnik instituta zakonodatel’stva Respubliki Kazahstan. No. 1(37). P. 122–127. (In Russian).
14. Azamattyq prosestık kodeks. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyñ 1999 jylğy 13 şıldedegı No. 411 Zañy. Qol jetımdılık «Ädılet» aqparattyq-qūqyqtyq jüiesımen qamtamasyz etılgen. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/K990000411_ (ötınış berılgen kün: 30.05.2025). (In Kazakh).
15. Opredelenie Zhetysuskogo rajonnogo suda goroda Almaty ot 17 oktjabrja 2023 goda po grazhdanskomu delu No. 7515-23-00-2/2294 o vozvrashhenii iskovogo zajavlenija: sudebnye akty. Dostup predostavlen edinym oknom «Sudebnyj kabinet» dlja dostupa k jelektronnym servisam sudebnyh organov Respubliki Kazahstan. Rezhim dostupa: dlja zaregistrirovannyh pol’zovatelej. URL: https://office.sud.kz/new/ (data obrashhenija: 30.05.2025). (In Russian).
16. Almaty qalasy Alatau audandyq sotynyñ 2023 jylğy 30 qazandağy No. 7575-23-00-1/225 qylmystyq ısı boiynşa ükımı: sot aktılerı. Qol jetımdılık «Sot kabinetı» Qazaqstan Respublikasy sot organdarynyñ elektrondyq servisterıne qol jetkızuge arnalğan bıryñğai terezesımen qamtamasyz etılgen. Kıru rejimı: tırkelgen qoldanuşylar üşın. URL: https://office.sud.kz/new/ (ötınış berılgen kün: 30.05.2025). (In Kazakh).
Review
For citations:
Utanov M.A., Aueshova B.T., Toilybekova E.O., Ablaeva E.B. Civil law transactions as a means of committing fraud. Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2025;(3(12)):111-121. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2025-1-3-111-121