Legal models of joint management of transboundary water resources in the international and comparative legal context

Article examines legal models of joint management of transboundary water resources in context of increasing water scarcity, climate change, and environmental risks. Purpose of study is to identify effective international and comparative legal mechanisms regulating cooperation between states and to determine key directions for modernizing existing governance models. Scientific and practical significance lies in systematizing contemporary principles of international water law and revealing gap between treaty norms and their implementation in different regions. Research methodology includes comparative legal, formal legal, and systemic approaches applied to analysis of 1992 and 1997 UN Conventions, regional agreements, and national legislation. Study establishes that effectiveness of transboundary water cooperation depends on completeness of treaty framework, institutional stability of joint commissions, availability of control and monitoring mechanisms, and integration of ecosystem-based approach. It is concluded that shift is required from declarative agreements toward comprehensive basin-oriented governance models. Special attention is given to role of data exchange and stakeholder participation. Importance of judicial safeguards for environmental rights is emphasized. Practical value of findings is linked to possible application in developing water policy and drafting interstate agreements.

1. Sindico F. (2021) National Sovereignty Versus Transboundary Water Cooperation: Can You See International Law Reflected in the Water? // AJIL Unbound. Vol. 115. P. 178–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2021.24 (In English)

2. Sluchevskaja Ju.A. (2019) Problemy formirovanija mezhdunarodno-pravovoj modeli sovmestnogo ispol’zovanija i ohrany mezhdunarodnyh vodotokov // Lex Russica. No. 3 (148). P. 73–86. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2019.148.3.073-086 (In Russian)

3. McCaffrey S.C. (2014) International water cooperation in the 21st century: Recent developments in the law of international watercourses // Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 4–14. DOI: 10.1111/reel.12064 (In English)

4. Ozenbayeva A., Yerezhepkyzy R., Yessetova S., Jangabulova A., Beissenbayeva M. (2022) Legal regulation of transboundary water resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan // Environmental Development. Vol. 44. Art. 100781. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100781 (In English)

5. Konvencija po ohrane i ispol’zovaniju transgranichnyh vodotokov i mezhdunarodnyh ozer (Hel’sinki, 17–18 marta 1992 g.). URL: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/pdf/watercon.pdf (In Russian)

6. Konvencija OON o prave nesudohodnyh vidov ispol’zovanija mezhdunarodnyh vodotokov (N’juJork, 21 maja 1997 g.). URL: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/8_3_1997.pdf (In Russian)

7. Soglashenie mezhdu Respublikoj Kazahstan, Kyrgyzskoj Respublikoj, Respublikoj Tadzhikistan, Turkmenistanom i Respublikoj Uzbekistan o sotrudnichestve v sfere upravlenija i ohrany vodnyh resursov mezhgosudarstvennyh istochnikov (Alma-Ata, 18 fevr. 1992 g.). URL: https://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/documents/asia.html#CA_Wate (In Russian)

8. Soglashenie mezhdu Pravitel’stvom Respubliki Kazahstan i Pravitel’stvom Respubliki Uzbekistan o sovmestnom upravlenii i ispol’zovanii transgranichnyh vodnyh ob#ektov (Tashkent, 21 dek. 2022 g.). URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2200000711 (In Russian)

9. Sarfaraz M.U., Hall D.M., Rotman R.M. (2022) Data sharing in transboundary water management // Frontiers in Water. Vol. 4. Article 982605. P. 1–7. DOI: 10.3389/frwa.2022.982605 (In English)

10. Reichert G. (2016) Transboundary water cooperation in Europe – a successful multidimensional regime? // Brill Research Perspectives in International Water Law. Vol. 1. No. 1. 111 p. (In English)

11. Ziganshina D. (2023) Water infrastructure in Central Asia: legal and institutional frameworks // Frontiers in Climate. Vol. 5. Article 1284400. P. 1–6. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2023.1284400 (In English)

12. Konstitucija Respubliki Kazahstan : prinjata na respublikanskom referendume 30 avg. 1995 g. URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K950001000_ (In Russian)

13. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia T-622/16 (10 nov. 2016). Decisión sobre el río Atrato como sujeto de derechos. URL: https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/T-622-16.htm (In English)

14. Schmeier S. (2023) The role of institutionalized cooperation in transboundary basins in mitigating conflict potential over hydropower dams // Frontiers in Climate. Vol. 5. Article 1283612. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2023.1283612 (In English)

15. Seqat N. (2022) The principe of public participation in transboundary water resources management: a case study of transboundary basin organizations // Revue internationale de droit économique. Vol. XXXVI. No. 2. P. 55–75. DOI: 10.3917/ride.362.0055 (In English)