Preview

Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law

Advanced search

Implementation of the Сouncil of Еurope convention CETS no. 216 into the criminal legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan: problems of qualification and proof (on the example of the verdict in the case of Bizhanov and others).

https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-3-125-138

Abstract

The article addresses the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs into the criminal legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Its relevance follows from the forthcoming ratification of the Convention and the need to align national criminal law with its requirements. The purpose is to identify the gaps in the current wording of Article 116 of the Criminal Code and to develop ways of eliminating them by comparing the conventional obligations with the materials of a specific criminal case. The methodological basis comprises formal-legal, comparative-legal, systemic and criminological methods, analysis of judicial practice and legal modelling. It is established that the national provision criminalises mainly the act of removal and unlawful transactions, whereas the conventional standard requires liability for recruitment, offering, mediation, transportation, storage and financing of illicit organ trafficking. Judicial materials show that donors acting under extreme need and deception are convicted on an equal footing with the organisers. A new wording of Article 116, separate offences of recruitment, mediation and document forgery, a note on donor-victim immunity, and administrative liability of legal persons are proposed. The conclusions are applicable in law-making and law enforcement.

About the Authors

Zh. K. Zhanserkenov
M. Esbulatov Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

PhD student

Almaty



B. B. Sarsenbayeva
M. Esbulatov Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

c.l.s., professor

Almaty



References

1. WHO Guiding Principles on Human Cell, Tissue and Organ Transplantation. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. 24 p. (In English)

2. Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs (CETS No. 216). Santiago de Compostela, 25.03.2015. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16806dca3a (accessed: 02.04.2026). (In English)

3. Ugolovnyj kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan: Kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 3 ijulja 2014 goda No. 226- V (s izmenenijami i dopolnenijami). URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1400000226 (data obrashhenija: 02.04.2026). (In Russian)

4. O zdorov’e naroda i sisteme zdravoohranenija: Kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 7 ijulja 2020 goda № 360-VI (s izmenenijami i dopolnenijami). URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K2000000360 (data obrashhenija: 02.04.2026). (In Russian)

5. Delmonico F.L., Domínguez-Gil B., Capron A.M. (2019) Ethical and legal issues in organ transplantation // Transplantation. Vol. 103. No. 2. P. 274–278. (In English)

6. Zhanserkenov Zh.K., Rahmet E.D. (2026) O neobhodimosti vvedenija instituta immuniteta donorazhertvy v stat’ju 116 UK Respubliki Kazahstan // Uchenye trudy Almatinskoj akademii MVD Respubliki Kazahstan imeni Makana Esbulatova. № 1(86). Р. 158–167. (In Russian)

7. Kan A.G., Nasyrova Je.M. (2025) Sovershenstvovanie mezhvedomstvennogo vzaimodejstvija v ramkah servisnoj modeli obespechenija bezopasnosti // Uchenye trudy Almatinskoj akademii MVD Respubliki Kazahstan imeni Makana Esbulatova. № 1(82). S. 294–300. URL: https://alpolac.edu.kz/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/zhurnal-N182.pdf (data obrashhenija: 02.04.2026). (In Russian)

8. Prigovor Specializirovannogo mezhrajonnogo suda po ugolovnym delam goroda Almaty po delu № 7598-25-00-1/37 ot 14.07.2025 g. URL: https://office.sud.kz/lawsuit/document.xhtml. (In Russian)

9. Martin D.E., Van Assche K., Domínguez-Gil B. et al. (2019) Strengthening global efforts to combat organ trafficking and transplant tourism: implications of the 2018 edition of the Declaration of Istanbul // Transplantation Direct. Vol. 5. No. 3. e433. (In English)

10. Explanatory Report to the Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs. Strasbourg, 2015. 58 p. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16800d3840 (accessed: 02.04.2026). (In English)

11. PietrobonA. (2016) Challengesin Implementing the European Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs // Leiden Journal of International Law. Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 485–502. DOI: 10.1017/S092215651600011X. (In English)

12. López-Fraga M., Domínguez-Gil B., Capron A.M., Van Assche K., Martin D., Cozzi E., Delmonico F.L. (2014) A needed Convention against trafficking in human organs // The Lancet. Vol. 383. No. 9936. P. 2187–2189. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60835-7. (In English)

13. Gawronska S. (2019) Organ trafficking and human trafficking for the purpose of organ removal: two international legal frameworks against illicit organ removal // New Journal of European Criminal Law. DOI: 10.1177/2032284419862387. (In English)

14. Columb S. (2017) Excavating the Organ Trade: An Empirical Study of Organ Trading Networks in Cairo, Egypt // British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 57. No. 6. P. 1301–1321. (In English)

15. Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 216: Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Treaty Office. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list (accessed: 28.08.2026). (In English)

16. Trafficking in organs, tissues and cells and trafficking in human beings for the purpose of the removal of organs: Joint Council of Europe / United Nations Study. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2009. (In English)

17. Handbook for parliamentarians: The Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs (CETS No. 216). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2019. (In English)

18. Columb S., Ambagtsheer F., Bos M., Ivanovski N., Moorlock G., Weimar W. Re-conceptualizing the organ trade: separating “trafficking” from “trade” and the implications for law and policy // Transplant International. 2017. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 209–213. (In English)

19. Farrell A., de Vries I. Measuring and understanding organ trafficking // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2020. Vol. 74. No. 2. P. 123–139. (In English)

20. Yea S. Trafficking in Organs and the Moral Limits of Consent // Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 98–115. (In English)

21. Shimazono Y. The state of the international organ trade: a provisional picture based on integration of available information // Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007. Vol. 85. No. 12. P. 955–962. (In English)


Review

For citations:


Zhanserkenov Zh.K., Sarsenbayeva B.B. Implementation of the Сouncil of Еurope convention CETS no. 216 into the criminal legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan: problems of qualification and proof (on the example of the verdict in the case of Bizhanov and others). Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law. 2026;(3(16)):125-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-3-125-138

Views: 9

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2959-4197 (Print)
ISSN 2959-4200 (Online)